The rate constants for the oxidative quenching of *Ru(bpy)32+ by MV2+ (kq) and the charge recombination reaction between Ru(bpy)33+ and MV•+ in bulk solution (krec) and the cage escape yields of the redox products (ηce) were determined as a function of added electrolytes (Na+ salts of oxyanions and halides) and temperature (10−60 °C) in aqueous solution. At 25 °C and constant [anion], kq and krec are a function of the specific anion, decreasing in the order ClO4- ≫ SO42- ∼ HPO42- > H2PO4- ∼ CH3CO2- and I- > Br- > Cl- > F-. Activation energies for kq and krec for ClO4- are ∼30% lower than the average values for the other salts. Values of ηce show anion-specific trends opposite to those for kq and krec. The reactant cations are extensively ion-paired by the dominant anions in bulk solution, and a similar situation is proposed to exist within the quenching solvent cage. The electron-transfer component of quenching for ion-paired species (kip) was extracted from kq by use of the Olson−Simonson treatment; ΔH⧧ (activation enthalpy) and λ (solvent reorganization energy) were evaluated for kip and back electron transfer within the solvent cage (kbt) and were found to be smallest for ClO4- and I-. The correlation that exists between kip or kbt and the standard free energy of hydration (ΔG°hyd) of the anions indicates that the rates of electron transfer between the cationic reactants are greatest in the presence of anions that have the most weakly-held hydration sphere and the greatest ability to break the water structure. The rate constants of quenching and charge recombination and the yields of redox products can be fine-tuned through the variation of the supporting electrolyte as well as the variation of temperature and ionic strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: