Glimepiride did not abolish the infarct-limiting effects of ischemic preconditioning (18.5% vs 43.7% in control, P<0.01) or diazoxide in isolated rat hearts, unlike glibenclamide.
Does glimepiride abolish the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning or diazoxide in isolated rat hearts?
Glimepiride, unlike glibenclamide, does not block the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning or mitochondrial K(ATP) channel opening in rat hearts, suggesting a potential advantage in diabetic patients with ischemic heart disease.
Absolute Event Rate: 18.5% vs 43.7%
p-value: p=<0.01
BACKGROUND: The sulfonylurea glibenclamide (Glib) abolishes the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning (IP), presumably by inhibiting mitochondrial K(ATP) channel opening in myocytes. Glimepiride (Glim) is a new sulfonylurea reported to affect nonpancreatic K(ATP) channels less than does Glib. We examined the effects of Glim on IP and on the protection afforded by diazoxide (Diaz), an opener of mitochondrial K(ATP) channels. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rat hearts were Langendorff-perfused, subjected to 35 minutes of regional ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion, and assigned to 1 of the following treatment groups: (1) control; (2) IP of 2x 5 minutes each of global ischemia before lethal ischemia; or pretreatment with (3) 30 micromol/L Diaz, (4) 10 micromol/L Glim, (5) 10 micromol/L Glib, (6) IP+Glim, (7) IP+Glib, (8) Diaz+Glim, or (9) Diaz+Glib. IP limited infarct size (18.5+/-1% vs 43.7+/-3% in control, P<0.01) as did Diaz (22.2+/-4.7%, P<0.01). The protective actions of IP or Diaz were not abolished by Glim (18.5+/-3% in IP+Glim, 22.3+/-3% in Diaz+Glim; P<0.01 vs control). However, Glib abolished the infarct-limiting effects of IP and Diaz. Patch-clamp studies in isolated rat ventricular myocytes confirmed that both Glim and Glib (each at 1 micromol/L) blocked sarcolemmal K(ATP) currents. However, in isolated cardiac mitochondria, Glim (10 micromol/L) failed to block the effects of K(ATP) opening by GTP, in contrast to the blockade caused by Glib. CONCLUSIONS: Although it blocks sarcolemmal currents in rat cardiac myocytes, Glim does not block the beneficial effects of mitochondrial K(ATP) channel opening in the isolated rat heart. These data may have significant implications for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with ongoing ischemic heart disease.
Mocanu et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Myocardial ischemia. Glimepiride vs. Control and Glibenclamide was evaluated on Infarct size (p=<0.01). Glimepiride did not abolish the infarct-limiting effects of ischemic preconditioning (18.5% vs 43.7% in control, P<0.01) or diazoxide in isolated rat hearts, unlike glibenclamide.