Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Unaccompanied young refugees are a vulnerable group with high rates of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). Stepped care approaches are recommended as a potential treatment framework, but research on the effectiveness of these models remains scarce. We aimed to compare a stepped care approach for unaccompanied young refugees with enhanced usual care under real-world conditions. METHODS: In this cluster-randomised controlled type I hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial, we compared two active conditions, BETTER CARE and enhanced usual care, for unaccompanied young refugees in child and youth welfare service (CYWS) facilities across seven states in Germany. Eligibility criteria included age 12-20 years; arrival in Germany as unaccompanied minors; asylum application or intention; in CYWS facility care at baseline; and at least one traumatic event reported. Masking of participants was not possible due to each CYWS facility being randomly assigned to a specific treatment arm. Additionally, although study personnel were not masked to the condition, all data were self-reported and study personnel remained masked to data entry. BETTER CARE was a stepped care approach consisting of screening, prevention (via the Mein Weg My Way group intervention), and trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT). Enhanced usual care included screening and a corresponding treatment recommendation. Clusters comprised one CYWS facility and were stratified and randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks. Self-report questionnaires were used to assess PTSS, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and quality of life at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome was a reduction in PTSS, analysed with the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS-2) score in the intention-to-treat sample (all randomly assigned participants). The study was preregistered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00017453). FINDINGS: The study was conducted between Oct 14, 2019, and July 27, 2023. 58 (11%) of 525 eligible facilities, including 627 unaccompanied young refugees originating from 40 countries, decided to participate and were randomly assigned. The mean age of the participants was 16·7 years (SD 1·3), with 569 (91%) identifying as male, 53 (8%) as female, and five (1%) as gender diverse. Participants reported a mean of six traumatic events (SD 3·3). 270 (43%) unaccompanied young refugees had clinically elevated levels of PTSS, and 357 (57%) were below the clinical threshold for PTSS (based on CATS-2 scores). 12 months after random assignment, there was a significant between-groups change over time effect size for PTSS in favour of BETTER CARE in the intention-to-treat sample (d=-0·17 95% CI -0·34 to -0·004). The dropout rate at 12 months was 38% (n=124) in BETTER CARE and 43% (n=131) in enhanced usual care. Service use and retention were low within the 12-month study period. INTERPRETATION: This study shows the effectiveness of a stepped care model including screening, prevention, and evidence-based interventions for unaccompanied young refugees in a high-income country. The potential benefit of screening and structured care recommendations was highlighted further by improvements in the enhanced usual care condition. Dropout rates were high but similar to those in previous studies with young refugees. Future studies should address demand-side barriers to improve service use and retention. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
Rosner et al. (Fri,) studied this question.