Key result
Review proposes a new notational analysis method for assessing contact intensity in collision sports.
Why the study?
Current methods for detecting contact events in collision sports have limitations including validity and reliability issues, varying thresholds, algorithm inconsistencies, and a lack of code- and sex-specific algorithms.
This review evaluates current methods for capturing contact events in collision sports and proposes a new notational analysis method to assess contact intensity.
Limitations in microtechnology urge cautious use of contact data in collision sports; leaves open validation of notational analysis before adoption.
Technological advancements have led to widespread use of wearable devices that capture external performance metrics in team sports. Tracking systems including global positioning system (GPS) technology with inbuilt microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), instrumented mouthguards (iMGs), and video analysis provide valuable insights into the contact demands of collision sports. In collision sports, successfully "winning the contact" is positively associated with better individual and team performance, but it also comes with a high risk of injury, posing a concern for player welfare. Understanding the frequency and intensity of these contact events is important in order for coaches and practitioners to adequately prepare players for competition and can simultaneously reduce the burden on athletes. Different methods have been developed for detecting contact events, although limitations of the current methods include validity and reliability issues, varying thresholds, algorithm inconsistencies, and a lack of code- and sex-specific algorithms. In this review, we evaluate common methods for capturing contact events in team collision sports and detail a new method for assessing contact intensity through notational analysis, offering a potential alternative for capturing contact events that are currently challenging to detect through microtechnology alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolger et al. (2025) conducted a review in Collision sports contact events. Methods for capturing contact events (GPS, MEMS, iMGs, video analysis) was evaluated. A review of methods for capturing contact events in collision sports highlights limitations in current microtechnology and proposes a new notational analysis method for assessing contact intensity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: