Key result
Micro-sensor technology collision metrics correlated very strongly with expert video-coded collisions (r = 0.91, 90% CI 0.89-0.93).
Why the study?
The study aimed to determine the relationship between collision metrics from micro-sensor technology and the count of collisions coded by expert video analysts in professional rugby union.
Does micro-sensor technology accurately detect collision events compared to expert video analysis in professional rugby union players?
Observational (n=44)
Does micro-sensor technology accurately detect collision events compared to expert video analysis in professional rugby union players?
Effect estimate: r = 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.93)
Automated collision detection using micro-sensor technology is highly correlated with expert video analysis in professional rugby union, suggesting its feasibility for monitoring player loads.
MST collision tracking may inform rugby load management; leaves open accuracy thresholds and outcome validation before clinical adoption.
This study aimed to determine the relationship between collision metrics from a commercially available micro‐sensor technology unit (MST) and the count of collisions coded by expert video analysts in professional rugby union. Forty‐four professional rugby union players wore MST units during match play. We analyzed 245 combined data files from 11 competitive matches, resulting in the inclusion of a total of 9202 individual collision events. Collision metrics (the count of collisions and the Collision Load™) were analyzed via the manufacturer's software. Each match was also video recorded and evaluated by two expert video analysts. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to determine the relationship between the count of collisions coded by the expert video analysts, and both MST collision metrics. One‐way ANOVA was used to determine whether differences in the Collision Load™ for individual collision events existed between different playing positions. Very large—nearly perfect correlations were observed between the count of collisions coded by the expert video analysts and both MST collision metrics (the count of collisions: r = 0.91, 90% CI = 0.89‐0.93; the Collision Load™: r = 0.89; 90% CI = 0.87‐0.91). Differences in the Collision Load™ for individual collision events were identified between different playing positions. Collision metrics registered by the MST software relate very strongly with the count of collisions coded by expert video analysts. The typical Collision Load TM per individual collision event varies depending on player position. The application of automated collision detection for rugby union appears feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tierney et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Professional rugby union players (n=44). Micro-sensor technology (MST) collision metrics vs. Expert video analyst coded collisions was evaluated on Correlation between MST collision metrics and video-coded collisions (r = 0.91, 95% CI 0.89-0.93). Micro-sensor technology collision metrics correlated very strongly with expert video-coded collisions (r = 0.91, 90% CI 0.89-0.93).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: