Why the study?
Does aortocoronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) improve relief of angina pectoris in patients with coronary-artery disease compared to earlier operations?
Does aortocoronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) improve relief of angina pectoris in patients with coronary-artery disease compared to earlier operations?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This historical perspective highlights CABG as a superior surgical intervention for sustained relief of angina pectoris compared to earlier surgical methods.
The surgical treatment of coronary-artery disease began early in this century when surgical sympathectomy was reported as a successful treatment for angina pectoris. Since then a variety of procedures have been tried, all of which were greeted with initial enthusiasm, which then rapidly waned. However, aortocoronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) is qualitatively superior to the earlier operations because it is associated with marked and sustained relief of angina pectoris in most patients. Since the delivery of substantial quantities of blood to previously ischemic myocardium can be accomplished with relatively low mortality by a skilled, experienced surgical team, the indications for this . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eugene Braunwald (1977) conducted a review in coronary-artery disease. aortocoronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: