Key result
Absolute CV risk counseling yields ~60% greater improvement in quality of life vs usual care.
Why the study?
To evaluate the impact of absolute cardiovascular risk counselling on quality-of-life indices within a chest pain clinic.
Does absolute cardiovascular risk counselling improve health-related quality of life in patients attending a rapid access chest pain clinic?
Population
189 patients attending an Australian chest pain clinic
Comparison
Absolute cardiovascular risk counselling vs usual care
Design
Prospective, open-label, blinded-endpoint randomized study
Follow-up
Minimum 12-months
Authors
Loading...
Supports integrating absolute cardiovascular risk counselling into chest pain clinics; extends RCT evidence on quality-of-life benefits.
RCT (n=189)
open-label, blinded-endpoint
randomised
No
Does absolute cardiovascular risk counselling improve health-related quality of life in patients attending a rapid access chest pain clinic?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.16% vs 0.1%
Proactive absolute cardiovascular risk counselling in a rapid access chest pain clinic yields clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported health-related quality of life compared to usual care.
Black et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in chest pain (n=189). Absolute cardiovascular risk counselling vs. usual care was evaluated on health state utilities (HSU) generated using SF-36 responses and the SF-6D's Australian tariff. Absolute cardiovascular risk counselling in a chest pain clinic yielded clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life compared to usual care (0.16 vs 0.10 utility points).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: