Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CONTEXT: Anti-Müllerian hormone based (AMH) age at menopause predictions remain cumbersome due to predictive inaccuracy. OBJECTIVE: To perform an Individual Patient Data (IPD) meta-analysis, regarding AMH based menopause prediction. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective cohort studies regarding menopause prediction using serum AMH levels were selected by consensus discussion. DATA SELECTION: Individual cases were included if experiencing a regular cycle at baseline. Exclusion criteria were hormone use and gynecological surgery. DATA SYNTHESIS: 2596 women were included, 1077 experienced menopause. A multivariable Cox regression analysis assessed time to menopause (TTM) using age and AMH. AMH predicted TTM, however, added value on top of age was poor (age alone C-statistic 84%; age + AMH HR 0.66 95% CI 0.61-0.71, C-statistic 86%). Moreover, the capacity of AMH to predict early (≤45 years) and late menopause (≥55 years) was assessed. An added effect of AMH was demonstrated for early menopause (age alone C-statistic 52%; age + AMH HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.24-0.45, C-statistic 80%). A Weibull regression model calculating individual age at menopause revealed that predictive inaccuracy remained present and increased with decreasing age at menopause. Lastly, a check of non-proportionality of the predictive effect of AMH demonstrated a reduced predictive effect with increasing age. CONCLUSION: AMH was a significant predictor of TTM and especially of time to early menopause. However, individual predictions of age at menopause demonstrated a limited precision, particularly when concerning early age at menopause, making clinical application troublesome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Depmann et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: