Key result
Protocol outlines planned systematic review evaluating risk prediction models for acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Existing risk prediction models for AHF vary in clinical usability and reported performance across validation cohorts, creating uncertainty and difficulty for clinicians in model selection.
What is the predictive performance, applicability, and clinical impact of extant multivariable prognostic models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure?
Systematic Review
What is the predictive performance, applicability, and clinical impact of extant multivariable prognostic models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure?
This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance and clinical utility of risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in acute heart failure.
Planned meta-analysis of acute HF risk models will guide selection for mortality/readmission prediction; leaves open optimal tools and clinical adoption pending synthesis.
INTRODUCTION: A considerable number of risk models, which predict outcomes in mortality and readmission rates, have been developed for patients with acute heart failure (AHF) to help stratify patients by risk level, improve decision making, and save medical resources. However, some models exist in a clinically useful manner such as risk scores or online calculators, while others are not, providing only limited information that prevents clinicians and patients from using them. The reported performance of some models varied greatly when predicting at multiple time points and being validated in different cohorts, which causes model users uncertainty about the predictive accuracy of these models. The foregoing leads to users facing difficulties in the selection of prediction models, and even sometimes being reluctant to utilize models. Therefore, a systematic review to assess the performance at multiple time points, applicability, and clinical impact of extant prediction models for mortality and readmission in AHF patients is essential. It may facilitate the selection of models for clinical implementation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Four databases will be searched from their inception onwards. Multivariable prognostic models for mortality and/or readmission in AHF patients will be eligible for review. Characteristics and the clinical impact of included models will be summarized qualitatively and quantitatively, and models with clinical utility will be compared with those without. Predictive performance measures of included models with an analogous clinical outcome appraised repeatedly, will be compared and synthesized by a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of validation studies for a common prediction model at the same time point will also be performed. We will also provide an overview of critical appraisal of the risk of bias, applicability, and reporting transparency of included studies using the PROBAST tool and TRIPOD statement. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021256416.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Acute heart failure. Risk prediction models was evaluated on Mortality and/or readmission. This protocol outlines a planned systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance, applicability, and clinical impact of risk prediction models for acute heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: