Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Biodiversity knowledge is fundamental to conservation planning and sustainable environmental decision-making; however, general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently produce hallucinations when responding to biodiversity-related queries. To address this challenge, we propose BioChat, a domain-specific question-answering system that integrates a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework with a Re-Ranker–based retrieval and routing mechanism. The system is built upon a verified biodiversity dataset curated by the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), comprising 25,593 species and approximately 970,000 structured data points. We systematically evaluate the effects of embedding selection, routing strategy, and generative model choice on factual accuracy and hallucination mitigation. Experimental results show that the proposed Re-Ranker-based routing strategy significantly improves system reliability, increasing factual accuracy from 47.9% to 71.3% and reducing hallucination rate from 34.0% to 24.4% compared with Naive RAG baseline. Among the evaluated LLMs, Qwen2-7B-Instruct achieves the highest factual accuracy, while Gemma-2-9B-Instruct demonstrates superior hallucination control. By delivering transparent, verifiable, and context-grounded biodiversity information, BioChat supports environmental education, citizen science, and evidence-based conservation policy development. This work demonstrates how trustworthy AI systems can serve as sustainability-enabling infrastructure, facilitating reliable access to biodiversity knowledge for long-term ecological conservation and informed public decision-making.
Jang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: