Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper investigates the ability of artificial neural networks to judge the grammatical acceptability of a sentence, with the goal of testing their linguistic competence. We introduce the Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability (CoLA), a set of 10,657 English sentences labeled as grammatical or ungrammatical from published linguistics literature. As baselines, we train several recurrent neural network models on acceptability classification, and find that our models outperform unsupervised models by Lau et al. (2016) on CoLA. Error-analysis on specific grammatical phenomena reveals that both Lau et al.’s models and ours learn systematic generalizations like subject-verb-object order. However, all models we test perform far below human level on a wide range of grammatical constructions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alex Warstadt
ETH Zurich
Amanpreet Singh
Lovely Professional University
Samuel R. Bowman
Supélec
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
New York University
Supélec
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Warstadt et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07a0a5c9983f2ec4c64794 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00290