Key result
Post-discharge RAASi use in sepsis survivors linked to ~32% lower mortality and MACE risk.
Why the study?
RAAS inhibitors are often stopped during sepsis hospitalization due to renal hypoperfusion concerns, but whether they should be continued after discharge remains unknown.
Does the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors reduce all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events in sepsis survivors after discharge?
Cohort (n=9,188)
Does the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors reduce all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events in sepsis survivors after discharge?
Effect estimate: HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.62-0.75)
Continuation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors after hospital discharge in sepsis survivors is associated with significantly reduced risks of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events.
May support RAAS inhibitor continuation in sepsis survivors; hypothesis-generating, requiring RCTs before practice change.
Background Sepsis is known to increase morbidity and duration of hospital stay and is a common cause of mortality worldwide. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) are commonly used to treat hypertension but are usually discontinued during hospitalization for sepsis because of concerns about renal hypoperfusion. The aim of our study was to investigate whether RAASis should be continued after discharge in sepsis survivors and to identify the effects on the clinical outcomes. Methods and Results A total of 9188 sepsis survivors aged 20 years and older who were discharged from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2019 were included in our analyses. We further divided sepsis survivors into RAASi users and nonusers. These groups were matched by propensity scores before the outcomes of interest, including all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), were examined. After propensity score matching, 3106 RAASi users and 3106 RAASi nonusers were included in our analyses. Compared with RAASi nonusers, RAASi users had lower risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.75), MACEs (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94), ischemic stroke (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.96), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90), and hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92). Subgroup analyses stratified by admission to the ICU and the use of inotropes showed similar results. Conclusions In our study, we found that RAASi users had reduced risks of all-cause mortality and MACEs. These findings suggested a beneficial effect of RAASi use by sepsis survivors after discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ou et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Sepsis (n=9,188). Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) vs. RAASi nonusers was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.62-0.75). Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor use after discharge in sepsis survivors was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.62-0.75) and MACE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: