Key result
A new renin-angiotensin system inhibitor prescription after sepsis was associated with a lower hazard of major cardiovascular events (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.87-0.99).
Why the study?
Adult sepsis survivors face an increased risk of long-term cardiovascular events, but whether this risk is mitigated by renin-angiotensin system inhibitors was unknown.
Does a new prescription of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor reduce the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality in adult sepsis survivors?
Cohort (n=7,174)
Does a new prescription of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor reduce the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality in adult sepsis survivors?
Hazard Ratio: 0.93 (95% CI 0.87–0.99)
In adult sepsis survivors without standard indications for RASi, a new prescription of a RASi within 30 days of discharge was associated with a reduced risk of major cardiovascular events and mortality compared to calcium channel blockers or thiazide diuretics.
Rationale Adult sepsis survivors have an increased risk of experiencing long-term cardiovascular events. Objectives To determine whether the cardiovascular risk after sepsis is mitigated by renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi). Methods We conducted a population-based cohort study of adult sepsis survivors designed to emulate a target randomized trial with an active comparator and new-user design. We excluded patients with a first-line indication for prescription of RASi (e.g., coronary heart disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension with diabetes mellitus). The main exposure of interest was a new prescription of a RASi within 30 days of hospital discharge. The active comparator was a new prescription of either a calcium channel blocker or a thiazide diuretic, also within 30 days of hospital discharge. The primary outcome of interest was the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality during follow-up to 5 years. We used inverse probability weighting of a Cox proportional hazards model and reported results using hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results The cohort included 7,174 adult sepsis survivors, of whom 3,805 were new users of a RASi and 3,369 were new users of a calcium channel blocker or a thiazide diuretic. New users of a RASi experienced a lower hazard of major cardiovascular events than new users of a calcium channel blocker or a thiazide diuretic (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–0.99). This association was consistent across different follow-up intervals and multiple sensitivity analyses. Conclusions A new RASi prescription is associated with a reduction in major cardiovascular events after sepsis. A randomized controlled trial should be considered to confirm this finding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angriman et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Sepsis (n=7,174). Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) vs. Calcium channel blocker or a thiazide diuretic was evaluated on Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99). A new renin-angiotensin system inhibitor prescription after sepsis was associated with a lower hazard of major cardiovascular events (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.87-0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: