Key result
Eplerenone completely halts P wave duration and dispersion increases vs amlodipine in hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Does eplerenone improve P wave morphology and fibrosis biomarkers compared to amlodipine in patients with hypertension?
RCT (n=35)
Does eplerenone improve P wave morphology and fibrosis biomarkers compared to amlodipine in patients with hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 3.2%
p-value: p=<0.05
Eplerenone prevented the increase in P wave duration and dispersion and decreased fibrosis biomarkers compared to amlodipine in hypertensive patients, suggesting a potential mechanism for AF prevention.
Eplerenone may attenuate atrial remodeling in hypertension; extends RCT evidence on P-wave and fibrosis markers toward AF prevention trials.
BACKGROUND: Eplerenone is reported to reduce the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to clarify the mechanism of eplerenone for AF prevention from the viewpoint of P wave morphology, which is reported to correlate with atrial fibrosis. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with hypertension, who were randomized to receive eplerenone (n = 16) or amlodipine (n = 19) for 1 year, were evaluated. P wave signal-averaged electrocardiography was recorded at baseline and 1 year after entry, and P wave duration (Ad) and P wave dispersion (P-disp) were obtained. Serum levels of intact procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and N-terminal procollagen-III peptide (PIIIP) were also measured. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics including Ad, P-disp, and the decrease in blood pressure at 1-year follow-up between the two groups. Ad and P-disp (mean ± standard deviation) significantly increased in patients on amlodipine after 1 year (140 ± 21 ms to 139 ± 19 ms vs 132 ± 10 ms to 136 ± 12 ms, P < 0.01 and 14 ± 7 ms to 9 ± 4 ms vs 12 ± 5 to 16 ± 8, P < 0.01, respectively). PINP was significantly more decreased in patients with eplerenone than amlodipine (56.6 ± 30.4 μg/mL to 46.6 ± 19.4 μg/mL vs 41.5 ± 16.2 μg/L to 48.7 ± 21.3 μg/L, P < 0.01). Percent changes of Ad, P-disp, PINP, and PIIIP were significantly smaller in patients with eplerenone than amlodipine (0.0 ± 4.7% vs 3.2 ± 4.4%, P < 0.05, - 28.6 ± 31.0% vs 46.3 ± 73.0%, P < 0.01, - 5.6 ± 38.1% vs 22.7 ± 42.7%, P < 0.05, and - 9.2 ± 25.1% vs 7.4 ± 19.0%, P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Eplerenone reduced the increase of Ad and P-disp with a decrease of PINP and PIIIP, which might translate into reduction of atrial fibrosis. This study showed that eplerenone may be useful as upstream therapy for AF in patients with hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawasaki et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=35). Eplerenone vs. Amlodipine was evaluated on Percent change in P wave duration (Ad) (p=<0.05). Eplerenone significantly reduced the percent change in P wave duration (0.0% vs 3.2%, P<0.05) and dispersion compared to amlodipine in hypertensive patients over 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: