Key result
AF ablation shows similar recurrence and complication rates in patients ≥75 versus <65 years.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is frequently performed in older patients but may have lower success rates and higher complication rates.
Does catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation have similar success rates, complication rates, and effects on cardiac function in late old-aged patients (≥ 75 years) compared to younger patients?
Cohort (n=368)
No
Does catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation have similar success rates, complication rates, and effects on cardiac function in late old-aged patients (≥ 75 years) compared to younger patients?
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients aged 75 and older is effective and has a similar complication rate to younger patients, while significantly improving left atrial structure and function at 1 year.
May support ablation in selected patients ≥75 years; leaves open randomized confirmation of efficacy.
The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with age and treatment with catheter ablation is performed frequently. Catheter ablation may have a lower rate of success and a higher rate of complications in older patients.We compared the characteristics, success rates, and complications of catheter ablation in patients with AF categorized into late old-aged (≥ 75 years, n = 148), early old-aged (65-74 years), n = 129), and middle-aged (< 65 years, n = 91) groups. Effects of catheter ablation on cardiac function in the left ventricle (LV) and left atrium (LA), and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels were evaluated at baseline and 1 year.AF ablation was successfully performed in older patients and the recurrence rate did not differ between groups (late old-aged: 29.7%, early old-aged: 15.5%, middle-aged: 23.1%). Procedural complications did not statistically differ among the groups (late old-aged: 9.5%, early old-aged: 6.2%, middle-aged: 3.3%). The LA volume index was greater in the late old-aged patients than in the other 2 groups. As comorbidities, hypertension and history of heart failure and stroke were more common in late old-aged patients. At 1 year after ablation, the LV ejection fraction, the LA volume index, and LA emptying fraction were improved, even in late old-aged patients. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels were reduced in both the late old-aged and early-old-aged groups.Our findings indicate that AF ablation in late old-aged patients is effective, particularly with regard to LA structure and function, and the complication rate is similar to that in middle-aged patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamamoto et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=368). Catheter ablation vs. Middle-aged patients (< 65 years) was evaluated on Recurrence of atrial fibrillation at > 3 months (p=0.79). Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients ≥75 years showed a similar >3-month recurrence rate (29.7% vs 23.1%, p=0.79) and complication rate compared to patients <65 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: