Key result
Age ≥75 linked to ~2.7-fold higher HF hospitalization rate after cryoballoon ablation for AF.
Why the study?
Cryoballoon ablation achieves satisfactory outcomes in patients with AF, but its feasibility in older patients with HF remains unclear.
Does cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation yield comparable efficacy and prognosis in older patients (≥75 years) with heart failure compared to younger patients?
Cohort (n=549)
Yes
Does cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation yield comparable efficacy and prognosis in older patients (≥75 years) with heart failure compared to younger patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 4% vs 1.5%
p-value: p=0.008
Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation is feasible in older patients with heart failure and improves cardiac parameters, though they have a higher risk of late heart failure hospitalization compared to younger counterparts.
May warrant closer HF surveillance in older patients post-ablation; leaves open whether ablation modifies long-term HF risk.
BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) achieves satisfactory outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its feasibility in older patients with heart failure (HF) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the efficacy and prognosis of CBA in older patients with HF. METHODS: Among 3,655 patients undergoing CBA at 17 institutions, 549 patients (185 with ≥75 years [older], and 364 with <75 years [younger]) diagnosed with HF were analyzed. Recurrence, mortality, and HF hospitalization after CBA between the older and younger groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Simon-Makuch analyses. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on echocardiography and B-type natriuretic peptide levels were evaluated using linear regression analysis. Major procedural complications included stroke, cardiac tamponade, phrenic nerve injury, prolonged hospitalization, and others. RESULTS: Most (78%) patients had a preserved LVEF of ≥50%. Major procedural complications were similar in the older and younger groups (3.2% vs 4.7%; P = 0.670). The recurrence-free survival and mortality rates were comparable between the 2 groups during a median follow-up period of 21.5 (12.0-37.0) months. The HF hospitalization rate was higher in the older group (4.0 vs 1.5 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.008). In the older group, LVEF and B-type natriuretic peptide levels improved after ablation (from 57.4% to 60.0%, and 173 [113-292] to 87.8 [42-218] pg/mL). AF recurrence and HF hospitalization were closely linked, with most hospitalizations occurring after a year postablation. CONCLUSIONS: CBA for AF in older patients with HF is feasible and improves cardiac parameters; however, specific care is required owing to this population's unique characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazawa et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and Heart failure (n=549). Older age (≥75 years) vs. Younger age (<75 years) was evaluated on Heart failure hospitalization rate (per 100 patient-years) (p=0.008). Older age (≥75 years) was associated with a higher heart failure hospitalization rate (4.0 vs 1.5 per 100 patient-years) compared to younger patients after cryoballoon ablation, despite comparable recurrence and mortality rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: