Why the study?
Coronary microvascular dysfunction is an important feature of oHCM, and the prognostic value of CMD burden calculated by angiographic microvascular resistance required evaluation.
Does high angiographic microvascular resistance predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does high angiographic microvascular resistance predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
In patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, high angiographic microvascular resistance (≥7.04) is strongly associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, primarily driven by heart failure hospitalizations.
High AMR may aid MACE risk stratification in obstructive HCM; leaves open prospective validation and therapeutic targeting.
BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an important feature of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Angiographic microvascular resistance (AMR) offers a potent means for assessing CMD. This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of CMD burden calculated by AMR among oHCM patients. METHODS: We retrospectively screened all patients diagnosed with oHCM from Fuwai Hospital between January 2017 and November 2021. Off-line AMR assessments were performed for all 3 major coronary vessels by the independent imaging core laboratory. Patients were followed every 6 months post discharge via office visit or telephone contacts. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, and unplanned rehospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients presented with oHCM diseases enrolled in the present analyses. Mean age was 49.7, 57.6 % were men, mean 3-vessel AMR was 6.9. At a median follow-up of 18 months, high capability of 3-vessel AMR in predicting MACE was identified (AUC: 0.70) with the best cut-off value of 7.04. The primary endpoint of MACE was significantly higher in high microvascular resistance group (3-vessel AMR ≥ 7.04) as compared with low microvascular resistance group (56.5 % vs. 16.5 %; HR: 5.13; 95 % CI: 2.46-10.7; p < 0.001), which was mainly driven by the significantly higher risk of heart failure events in high microvascular resistance group. Additionally, 3-vessel AMR (HR: 4.37; 95 % CI: 1.99-9.58; p < 0.001), and age (per 1 year increase, HR: 1.03; 95 % CI: 1.01-1.06; p = 0.02) were independently associated with MACE. CONCLUSION: The present retrospective study demonstrated that the novel angiography-based AMR was a useful tool for CMD evaluation among patients with oHCM. High microvascular resistance as identified by 3-vessel AMR (≥7.04) was associated with worse prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: