Why the study?
Catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias is conventionally performed with fluoroscopy, but 3D mapping systems and intracardiac echocardiography enable zero-fluoroscopy ablation to eliminate radiation risks.
Does zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation prevent arrhythmias in pediatric patients with supraventricular tachycardias?
Does zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation prevent arrhythmias in pediatric patients with supraventricular tachycardias?
Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation is a highly effective and safe treatment option for various types of supraventricular tachycardias in pediatric patients, eliminating radiation exposure.
Supports zero-fluoroscopy ablation feasibility in pediatric SVT; extends observational data but leaves open randomized confirmation.
Catheter ablation (CA) of supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) is conventionally performed with the aid of X-ray fluoroscopy. Usage of a three-dimensional (3D) electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) system and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) enables zero-fluoroscopy ablation, eliminating the harmful effects of radiation. We retrospectively analyzed the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of zero-fluoroscopy radiofrequency and cryoablation of various types of SVTs in pediatric patients. Overall, in 171 consecutive patients (12.5 ± 3.9 years), 175 SVTs were diagnosed and 201 procedures were performed. The procedural success rate was 98% (193/197), or more precisely, 100% (86/86) for AVNRT, 95.8% (91/95) for AVRT, 94.1% (16/17) for AT and 100% (2/2) for AFL. No complications were recorded. Follow-up was complete in 100% (171/171) of patients. During the mean follow-up period of 488.4 ± 409.5 days, 98.2% of patients were arrhythmia-free with long-term success rates of 98.7% (78/79), 97.5% (78/80), 100% (13/13) and 100% (2/2) for AVNRT, AVRT, AT and AFL, respectively. Zero-fluoroscopy CA of various types of SVTs in the pediatric population is a feasible, effective and safe treatment option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Topalović et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: