Key result
CIED sonication yields ~70% higher diagnostic sensitivity than traditional cultures but increases false positives.
Why the study?
To analyze the usefulness of sonication in the microbiological diagnosis of CIED infections compared with traditional cultures.
Does sonication improve the microbiological diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections compared to traditional cultures?
Meta-Analysis (n=929)
Does sonication improve the microbiological diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections compared to traditional cultures?
Sonication of CIED samples improves the sensitivity of microbiological diagnosis compared to traditional cultures, though it may increase false positive rates without standardized positivity thresholds.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sonication may aid CIED infection diagnosis; leaves open need for standardized thresholds to limit false positives.
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated the utility of sonication to improve culture yield in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the usefulness of sonication in the microbiological diagnosis of CIED infections in comparison with traditional cultures. METHODS: Systematic database searches were performed to identify studies that provided enough data concerning both sensitivity and specificity of traditional (non-sonicated) and sonicated cultures from CIED samples. The diagnostic accuracy measures were obtained by three different statistical approaches: (i) The univariate model; (ii) The bivariate random; and (iii) The Bayesian bivariate hierarchical model. Heterogeneity was assessed using meta-regression. FINDINGS: Nine studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis (1684 cultures). The summary estimates of sensitivity were higher for sonicated cultures (0.756) in comparison with non-sonicated cultures (0.446). On meta-regression, sonication of CIEDs significantly increased the sensitivity (p = 0.001) as well as the rates of false positive results (p = 0.003). The final model also showed that the studies that used a threshold for positivity were associated with lower rates of false positive results (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that sonication improves the microbiological diagnosis of CIED infections in comparison with traditional cultures, but a standardization of processes is necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martín-Gutiérrez et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections (n=929). Sonication of explanted CIEDs vs. Traditional cultures (non-sonicated swab and device cultures) was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity (95% CI 0.677-0.820, p=0.001). Sonication of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices significantly improved diagnostic sensitivity to 0.756 compared to 0.446 for traditional cultures, though it increased false positive rates.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: