Key result
Sonication fluid culture demonstrated higher sensitivity (73.3% vs 26.7%, p<0.001) but lower specificity (48.5% vs 100%) compared to traditional culture for detecting cardiac device infections.
Why the study?
Does sonication fluid culture improve the microbial diagnosis of cardiac implantable device-associated infections compared to traditional culture in patients with removed cardiac implants?
Observational (n=83)
Does sonication fluid culture improve the microbial diagnosis of cardiac implantable device-associated infections compared to traditional culture in patients with removed cardiac implants?
Sonication of removed cardiac implantable electronic devices improves the sensitivity of microbiological diagnosis compared to traditional tissue culture, though it may detect colonization in clinically non-infected patients.
Sonication fluid culture may aid CIDAI detection; leaves open routine adoption pending standardized thresholds and prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: The clinical utility of sonication as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for the microbial diagnosis of cardiac implantable device-associated infections (CIDAIs) was investigated. METHODS: The implants of 83 subjects were investigated, 15 with a CIDAI and 68 without a clinical infection. Clinical data were analyzed prospectively and sonication fluid cultures (83 patients, 100%) and traditional cultures (31 patients, 37.4%) were performed RESULTS: Generator pocket infection and device-related endocarditis were found in 13 (86.7%) and four (26.7%) subjects, respectively. The mean numbers of previous technical complications and infections were higher in the infected patients compared to the non-infected patients (8 vs. 1, p<0.001; 2 vs. 0, p<0.031, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting CIDAI was 73.3% (11/15) and 48.5% (33/68) for sonication fluid culture, and 26.7% (4/15) and 100% (16/16) for traditional culture (p<0.001), respectively. A higher number of organisms were identified by sonication fluid than by tissue culture (58 vs. 4 specimens; p<0.001). The most frequent organisms cultured were Gram-positive cocci (66.1%), mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (35.5%). Thirty-five (51.5%) non-infected subjects were considered colonized due to the positive identification of organisms exclusively through sonication fluid culture. CONCLUSIONS: Sonication fluid culture from the removed cardiac implants has the potential to improve the microbiological diagnosis of CIDAIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inacio et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable device-associated infections (n=83). Sonication fluid culture vs. Traditional culture was evaluated on Sensitivity for detecting CIDAI (p=<0.001). Sonication fluid culture demonstrated higher sensitivity (73.3% vs 26.7%, p<0.001) but lower specificity (48.5% vs 100%) compared to traditional culture for detecting cardiac device infections.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: