Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Artificial intelligence (AI) often suffers from high energy consumption and complex deployment in resource-constrained environments, leading to a structural mismatch between capability and deployability. This review takes two representative scenarios—energy-first and performance-first—as the main thread, systematically comparing cloud, edge, and fog/cloudlet/mobile edge computing (MEC)/micro data center (MDC) architectures. Based on a standardized literature search and screening process, three categories of miniaturization strategies are distilled: redundancy compression (e.g., pruning, quantization, and distillation), knowledge transfer (e.g., distillation and parameter-efficient fine-tuning), and hardware–software co-design (e.g., neural architecture search (NAS), compiler-level, and operator-level optimization). The purposes of this review are threefold: (1) to unify the “architecture–strategy–implementation pathway” from a system-level perspective; (2) to establish technology–budget mapping with verifiable quantitative indicators; and (3) to summarize representative pathways for energy- and performance-prioritized scenarios, while highlighting current deficiencies in data disclosure and device-side validation. The findings indicate that, compared with single techniques, cross-layer combined optimization better balances accuracy, latency, and power consumption. Therefore, AI miniaturization should be regarded as a proactive method of structural reconfiguration for large-scale deployment. Future efforts should advance cross-scenario empirical validation and standardized benchmarking, while reinforcing hardware–software co-design. Compared with existing reviews that mostly focus on a single dimension, this review proposes a cross-level framework and design checklist, systematizing scattered optimization methods into reusable engineering pathways.
Tang et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: