Key result
LASI outperforms other parameters for diagnosing LVDD in SLE patients, yielding ~0.92 AUC.
Why the study?
LASI has proven promising for assessing LA and LV diastolic functions, but its diagnostic implication for LVDD in patients with SLE needed evaluation.
Does the left atrial stiffness index (LASI) accurately diagnose left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus?
Observational (n=202)
Does the left atrial stiffness index (LASI) accurately diagnose left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.919
The left atrial stiffness index (LASI) is a highly accurate echocardiographic marker (AUC 0.919) for detecting left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
May improve LVDD detection in SLE; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
OBJECTIVE: The left atrial stiffness index (LASI) has been proven to be a promising marker for assessing left atrial (LA) and left ventricular diastolic functions. This study aimed to evaluate the implication of LASI in diagnosing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in patients with SLE. METHODS: 145 patients diagnosed with SLE were enrolled and subdivided into two groups based on the absence of concomitant lupus nephritis (LN). Additionally, a control group comprising 57 healthy volunteers was recruited. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) was performed in all participants. Conventional parameters and the LA strains were obtained, and LASI was calculated. RESULTS: (1) Patients with SLE presented significantly increased LA size and reduced function, with a significant increase in LASI, especially in those with concomitant LN. (2) LASI was positively correlated with age, interventricular end-diastolic septal thickness (IVSd) and E/e' (mitral E peak velocity to e' peak velocity) average, and negatively correlated with LA total emptying fraction (LATEF), LA passive emptying fraction (LAPEF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), LA reservoir strain (LASr) and LA conduit strain (LAScd). Multivariate analysis showed that age, IVSd, maximum LA size and SLE activity index were independent determinants of LASI. (3) LASI demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for LVDD compared with E/e' average, LATEF, LASr and LAScd, with an area under the curve of 0.919. CONCLUSIONS: LASI can effectively reflect changes in LA function in patients with SLE and provide superior diagnostic accuracy compared with other parameters and LA strains for LVDD. Therefore, LASI could be a potential marker for the early detection of LVDD in patients with SLE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (n=202). Left atrial stiffness index (LASI) vs. E/e' average, LATEF, LASr and LAScd was evaluated on Diagnostic performance for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) (AUC 0.919). The left atrial stiffness index (LASI) demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with SLE compared with other parameters (AUC 0.919).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: