PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2024Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology

Methods for Assessing Left Ventricular Diastolic Distensibility

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

The LV end-diastolic pressure-volume ratio varies widely and depends heavily on inflow and resistance boundary conditions, complicating the assessment of left ventricular diastolic distensibility.

Comparison

Six calculated indices of LV diastolic stiffness

Key result

Diastolic stiffness index No. 4 was the only measure accounting for increased LV stiffness over diastole, showing weak dependence on LV hemodynamics for assessing distensibility.

Authors

VKV. I. KapelkoVLV. L. LakomkinAAA. A. Abramov

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Index No. 4 may aid LV diastolic assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.

Structured PICO

I
Intervention
Six calculated indices of left ventricular (LV) diastolic stiffness
O
Outcome
Stability, variation, and correlation coefficients with different hemodynamic parameterssurrogate

Diastolic stiffness index No. 4 is a robust measure for assessing LV diastolic distensibility across various cardiac pathologies, independent of LVEF and heart rate.

Cite This Study

Kapelko et al. (2024) studied Left ventricular diastolic distensibility. Diastolic stiffness index No. 4 vs. Other calculated indices of LV diastolic stiffness was evaluated on Stability, variation, and correlation coefficients with different hemodynamic parameters. Diastolic stiffness index No. 4 was the only measure accounting for increased LV stiffness over diastole, showing weak dependence on LV hemodynamics for assessing distensibility.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07ebebc3448d68e53784b7https://doi.org/10.1134/s0022093024010290
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share