Why the study?
What are the characteristics, clinical results, and complications of different carotid stent materials?
What are the characteristics, clinical results, and complications of different carotid stent materials?
This review outlines the current landscape of carotid stent materials, highlighting the benefits and ongoing challenges such as thrombosis and restenosis for bare-metal, drug-eluting, and biodegradable stents.
No stent type is complication-free; leaves open randomized trials on biodegradable options.
Endovascular angioplasty with stenting is a promising option for treating carotid artery stenosis. There exist a rapidly increasing number of different stent types with different materials. The bare-metal stent is the most commonly used stent with acceptable results, but it leaves us with the problems of thrombosis and restenosis. The drug-eluting stent is a breakthrough as it has the ability to reduce the restenosis rate, but the problem of late thrombosis still has to be addressed. The biodegradable stent disappears after having served its function. However, restenosis and degradation rates remain to be studied. In this article, we review every stent material with its characteristics, clinical results and complications and point out the standards of an ideal carotid stent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: