Key result
Coronary stent infection is a rare but life-threatening complication presenting within 4 weeks of PCI, carrying a high mortality rate of 40% despite antibiotics and surgical drainage.
Why the study?
What are the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of coronary stent infections after PCI?
What are the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of coronary stent infections after PCI?
Coronary stent infection is a rare but highly lethal complication of PCI that should be suspected in patients presenting with fever and chest pain within four weeks of the procedure.
Supports early suspicion of stent infection in post-PCI fever; leaves open prospective studies on incidence and prevention.
During the last two decades, the number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has steadily increased in Switzerland, as has the use of coronary stents. However, reports of coronary stent infections are very rare. In the present article we review all published cases of coronary stent infections. All patients presented with symptoms of infection within the first four weeks after PCI. Clinical hallmarks of stent infection were fever and chest pain. Blood cultures were positive in all patients. Despite the use of intravenous antibiotics in all except one patient and surgical drainage of the infectious focus in the majority of affected individuals mortality was high (40%). Thus, coronary stent infection, although exceedingly rare, represents a life-threatening complication and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with fever during the first few weeks after PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaufmann et al. (2005) conducted a review in Coronary stent infection. Intravenous antibiotics and surgical drainage was evaluated on Mortality. Coronary stent infection is a rare but life-threatening complication presenting within 4 weeks of PCI, carrying a high mortality rate of 40% despite antibiotics and surgical drainage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: