Why the study?
Small aortic annulus is associated with poorer hemodynamic outcomes in TAVR, and supra-annular self-expandable valves may offer better results than intra-annular self-expandable valves.
Do supra-annular self-expandable valves improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes compared to intra-annular self-expandable valves in patients undergoing TAVR with a small aortic annulus?
Do supra-annular self-expandable valves improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes compared to intra-annular self-expandable valves in patients undergoing TAVR with a small aortic annulus?
In patients with small aortic annuli undergoing TAVR, both supra-annular and intra-annular self-expandable valves demonstrate comparable clinical outcomes and excellent hemodynamic performance.
Comparable outcomes support either SA or IA SEV in small-annulus TAVR; hypothesis-generating, with randomized trials needed.
Background: Small aortic annulus is associated with poorer hemodynamic outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In these cases, supra-annular (SA) self-expandable valves (SEVs) may offer better results than intra-annular SEVs (IA SEVs). This study evaluated clinical and hemodynamic outcomes for SA SEVs (Evolut valves, Acurate valves) and IA SEVs (Portico/Navitor valves). Methods: We analyzed data from patients who underwent TAVR in Sweden between 2013 and 2022 with an annular diameter ≤23 mm, using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Endpoints included mortality, device, and technical success as per Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 definitions. Other endpoints were the incidence of post-TAVR mean or peak gradients over 20 and 40 mmHg, respectively, significant paravalvular leakage, new pacemaker implantation, and postprocedural aortic valve gradients. Results: < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.35-1.00). Conclusions: SA and IA SEVs show comparable clinical outcomes and excellent hemodynamic performance in patients with small aortic annuli. Further studies, including randomized trials, are needed to provide clearer guidance on valve selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Louca et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: