Key result
CGM-derived indices strongly outperform traditional metrics in predicting coronary plaque vulnerability.
Why the study?
Given the limited efficacy of current CAD screening methods, the study investigated whether glucose dynamics can predict coronary plaque vulnerability measured by virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound.
Do continuous glucose monitoring-derived indices of glucose dynamics better predict coronary plaque vulnerability compared to traditional diabetes diagnostic markers in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Observational (n=270)
Yes
Do continuous glucose monitoring-derived indices of glucose dynamics better predict coronary plaque vulnerability compared to traditional diabetes diagnostic markers in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
CGM-derived indices capturing glucose value, variability, and autocorrelation are superior to traditional diabetes markers for predicting coronary plaque vulnerability.
May enhance plaque vulnerability prediction beyond HbA1c; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Impaired glucose homeostasis leads to numerous complications, with coronary artery disease (CAD) being a major contributor to healthcare costs worldwide. Given the limited efficacy of current CAD screening methods, we investigated the association between glucose dynamics and a predictor of coronary events measured by virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound (%NC), with the aim of predicting CAD using easy-to-measure indices. We found that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived indices, particularly average daily risk ratio (ADRR) and AC_Var, exhibited stronger predictive capabilities for %NC compared to commonly used indices such as fasting blood glucose (FBG), hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), and plasma glucose level at 120 min during oral glucose tolerance tests (PG120). Factor analysis identified three distinct components underlying glucose dynamics – value, variability, and autocorrelation – each independently associated with %NC. ADRR was influenced by the first two components and AC_Var by the third. FBG, HbA1c, and PG120 were influenced only by the value component, making them insufficient for %NC prediction. Our results were validated using data sets from Japan (n=64), America (n=53), and China (n=100). CGM-derived indices reflecting the three components of glucose dynamics can serve as more effective screening tools for CAD risk assessment, complementing or possibly replacing traditional diabetes diagnostic methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugimoto et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Coronary plaque vulnerability (n=270). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived indices vs. Traditional diabetes diagnostic methods (FBG, HbA1c, PG120) was evaluated on Prediction of coronary plaque vulnerability (%NC). Continuous glucose monitoring-derived indices reflecting value, variability, and autocorrelation exhibited stronger predictive capabilities for coronary plaque vulnerability (R2=0.36) compared to traditional indices (R2=0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: