Key result
RHC successfully diagnoses restrictive cardiomyopathy in a Mulibrey nanism toddler despite subtle echocardiographic findings.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the limitations of echocardiography in diagnosing restrictive cardiomyopathy in Mulibrey nanism and the utility of right heart catheterization.
Right heart catheterization may detect restrictive cardiomyopathy missed by echocardiography in Mulibrey nanism; leaves open optimal diagnostic strategies in rare disorders.
Mulibrey nanism (MN) is a extremely rare genetic condition first described in 1973, with around 150 cases reported worldwide. MN is characterised by growth delay and multiorgan manifestations, the most fatal being a combination restrictive-constrictive, perimyocardial heart disease that results in diastolic heart failure. We present a male toddler with MN who presented with recurrent episodes of hypoxia, feeding intolerance, and generalised swelling (anasarca) in the setting of subtle echocardiographic findings. A multidisciplinary and systematic diagnostic approach was used to determine the underlying aetiology. Invasive cardiac testing via right heart catheterisation revealed the final diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy. Transplant decision-making was limited due to hepatic involvement. This case highlights the limitations of echocardiography in diagnosing restrictive cardiomyopathy, which has a preserved ejection fraction, as well the need for multidisciplinary involvement and a family-centred approach in treating patients with this rare condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kreinbrook et al. (2024) conducted a case report in Mulibrey nanism with restrictive cardiomyopathy (n=1). Right heart catheterisation was evaluated on Diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy. Invasive cardiac testing via right heart catheterisation successfully diagnosed restrictive cardiomyopathy in a toddler with Mulibrey nanism despite subtle echocardiographic findings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: