PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026Frontiers in Environmental Science0 citationsOpen Access

Analysis of grassland phenology dynamics and response to seasonal scale climate, topography in China based on geodetector for the period 2001 to 2019

ZGZhiyuan GongAnhui Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey and Design InstituteYTYe TianAnhui Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey and Design InstituteCWChunlin WangAnhui Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey and Design Institute

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to understand how seasonal climate factors and topography affect grassland phenology dynamics in China from 2001 to 2019.
  • Used GeoDetector to study seasonal climate responses and topography effects on grassland phenology.
  • Conducted spatial and trend analyses to assess the distribution of grassland phenology (CGP).
  • Performed correlation analysis to evaluate how climatic factors influence CGP at the seasonal level.
  • Start of season (SOS) delayed significantly with increased elevation and steep slopes, especially beyond 4 km and 25°.
  • End of season (EOS) advanced with higher elevation and slopes, showing a weaker interaction with climate influences compared to SOS.
  • Climatic interactions primarily affect SOS, emphasizing the need to consider topographic diversity in ecological management.

Abstract

Introduction There is limited research on the cumulative effects of seasonal climate factors and the combined impacts of climate and topography on grassland phenology. This gap hinders the understanding of the climate adaptability of China’s grasslands ecosystems. Methods This work used the GeoDetector method to examine how grassland phenology in China (CGP) responds to seasonal climate factors, elevation, slope, and aspect. First, we studied the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of CGP through spatial analysis and trend analysis methods. Second, we examined the effects of different climatic factors on CGP at the seasonal scale through correlation analysis. Third, we classified the topography of the study area and investigated the influence of different terrains on CGP. Finally, GeoDetector was used to quantify the explanatory power of seasonal climate and topography on CGP, as well as the impact of climate-topography interactions on CGP. Results and Discussion The results showed that with increasing preseason length, the areas showing a negative correlation between temperature and the start of season (SOS) expanded. SOS was negatively correlated with precipitation and evapotranspiration, except precipitation of the previous year and evapotranspiration in winter. Temperature, precipitation, and evapotranspiration all showed positive correlations with the end of season (EOS). The responses of SOS to elevation and slope exhibited nonlinear trends. When elevation exceeded 4 km, the rate of SOS delay accelerated markedly. SOS also showed significant delays at slopes greater than 25°. Meanwhile, with increasing elevation and slope, EOS tended to advance. The interaction effects of climate and topography on EOS were weaker than those on SOS. SOS (EOS) is primarily influenced by the interaction between elevation and evapotranspiration (precipitation), highlighting the importance of the interaction between DEM and climatic factors in shaping grassland phenology in China. The findings in this work suggest that topographic heterogeneity should be incorporated into ecological management to better respond to environmental challenges under climate change.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0808afa487c87a6a40aeb9https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1771178
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper