The research outlines procedures for filing direct constitutional cases in Iraq, indicating legal standards and requirements.
The constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005 grants the official bodies and persons the right to file a case directly before the Federal Supreme Court, so that these parties can appeal through the direct constitutional action must follow a set of formal procedures specified by the legal texts without which the )2017( بص ١ً جا عَ ١ الا بْار ی عً ًٛ ایکا ْٛ ْٝ ١ ٚایصٝاشٝ ١ - ایعدد ایثایث ععر - المج دً ایثا ْٞ - ایص ١ٓ 243 lawsuit is not accepted, On the necessary rules governing how these parties resort to the constitutional judiciary to challenge it through the direct constitutional case, and based on that we have addressed in this research all the procedures to be followed when challenged through this lawsuit before the Federal Court In this section, we have devoted the first to the formal procedures for the establishment of a direct constitutional case, in which we discussed the method of submitting a direct constitutional motion before the Federal Supreme Court and the statements that must be made in the petition and its communication to the litigants. And adjudicating it in the direct constitutional case and issuing the verdict and concluded with a number of conclusions and recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2017 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: