Randomized trial evaluates active-learning ethics curriculum for medical students, highlighting its relevance and engagement.
was overturned in 2022. Currently, however, there are limited curricula available focused on teaching reproductive health ethics in this environment. METHODS: We designed an active-learning small-group session for medical students as part of their bioethics pre-clerkship curriculum. Students participated in a session to review important ethical dilemmas in the context of authentic cases related to caring for pregnant patients facilitated by interdisciplinary faculty. Following the session, students evaluated the session using a retrospective pre-post survey to collect quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS: < .0001). They also described the session as engaging and relevant. Thematic analysis of narrative responses showed that students appreciated the opportunity to better understand a physician's responsibility in these challenging situations. CONCLUSIONS: Students valued this novel curriculum and recommended that it be repeated in future years. They also appreciated having a discussion space to consider the ethical dilemmas that clinicians may face in practice related to reproductive health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: