Assesses enrollment impacts of Medicaid work requirements in Georgia and Arkansas, suggesting reporting practices significantly influence compliance.
Medicaid work requirements have reemerged as a major federal policy, yet evidence on their enrollment effects is sparse. We reconcile sharply different outcomes from the only two states that implemented Medicaid work requirements: Arkansas, which reported high compliance, and Georgia, where enrollment has remained extremely low. We distinguish theoretical eligibility from observed enrollment and show that administrative reporting design is a first-order determinant of enrollment under Medicaid work requirements. Using monthly Medicaid enrollment data from Arkansas, we document a strong relationship between manual reporting and noncompliance and show that Georgia’s fully manual system yields enrollment consistent with this mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: