Demonstrates improved job application success in tech graduates, highlighting automation benefits.
The structural gap between the supply of engineering graduates and the availability of domain-aligned employment in India motivates the need for intelligent, candidate-facing job application tooling. Existing research addresses the recruiter side of the hiring pipeline—resume parsing, candidate ranking, and HR automation—while the job-seeker is left without automated, quality-controlled application support. A further limitation of prior work on LLM-based career document generation is the absence of any mechanism to verify generated content against the candidate’s actual credentials, a gap that introduces factual inaccuracy into submitted materials. This paper presents AutoHire, a self-hosted, end-to-end agentic system designed to assist Indian tech freshers throughout the full job application lifecycle. AutoHire comprises four principal components: a structured resume intelligence pipeline with Pydantic-validated output; a five-dimensional weighted job scoring engine producing interpretable match scores; a two-pass anti-hallucination cover letter generator that verifies every generated claim against the source resume before submission; and a ReAct-based Planner–Actor–Validator browser automation agent with confidence-gated human escalation and field-level crash recovery. Experiments were conducted at the module level: resume parsing was evaluated on 200 resumes achieving a macro-averaged F1 of 0.84; job scoring was evaluated on 400 resume–job pairs achieving a Spearman correlation of 0.79; hallucination verification was evaluated on 150 generated letters reducing the hallucination rate from 34% to 3%; and browser automation was evaluated over 120 form-fill runs achieving an 83% end-to-end completion rate. The system natively targets Internshala, Wellfound, and Naukri—Indian portals not addressed by any prior system in the reviewed literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
C et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: