Background: The global transition to low-carbon energy systems has intensified the need for circular approaches in energy supply chains, yet studies on second-life EV battery ecosystems in emerging economies remain fragmented between barrier prioritization and efficiency assessment. Methods: This study addresses this gap by integrating the Best–Worst Method (BWM) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to connect subjective expert-based prioritization with objective efficiency benchmarking. Using expert panel inputs and scenario-based circular energy configurations representing emerging economy conditions, the results indicate that technical barriers (28.4%) and economic barriers (24.9%) dominate the priority structure, with battery performance uncertainty and high initial investment as the most critical constraints. Results: DEA results show that configurations with formal reverse logistics and certification mechanisms achieve frontier efficiency (θ = 1.000), whereas fragmented informal configurations exhibit the lowest efficiency (θ = 0.712). High-tech configurations with weak regulation demonstrate that technological investment alone is insufficient without institutional development. Conclusions: The novelty lies in developing a context-sensitive BWM–DEA framework that embeds barrier priorities into efficiency evaluation, an approach rarely explored in prior circular supply chain research. The study provides a holistic decision-support tool for policymakers and industry stakeholders seeking to accelerate circular energy transitions in emerging economies.
Masudin et al. (Thu,) studied this question.