Study integrates efficiency and priority assessment in second-life EV battery ecosystems, suggesting a novel evaluation approach.
Background: The global transition to low-carbon energy systems has intensified the need for circular approaches in energy supply chains, yet studies on second-life EV battery ecosystems in emerging economies remain fragmented between barrier prioritization and efficiency assessment. Methods: This study addresses this gap by integrating the Best–Worst Method (BWM) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to connect subjective expert-based prioritization with objective efficiency benchmarking. Using expert panel inputs and scenario-based circular energy configurations representing emerging economy conditions, the results indicate that technical barriers (28.4%) and economic barriers (24.9%) dominate the priority structure, with battery performance uncertainty and high initial investment as the most critical constraints. Results: DEA results show that configurations with formal reverse logistics and certification mechanisms achieve frontier efficiency (θ = 1.000), whereas fragmented informal configurations exhibit the lowest efficiency (θ = 0.712). High-tech configurations with weak regulation demonstrate that technological investment alone is insufficient without institutional development. Conclusions: The novelty lies in developing a context-sensitive BWM–DEA framework that embeds barrier priorities into efficiency evaluation, an approach rarely explored in prior circular supply chain research. The study provides a holistic decision-support tool for policymakers and industry stakeholders seeking to accelerate circular energy transitions in emerging economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masudin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: