Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses angiogenic potential of bioactive glass composites in stem cell and endothelial cell co-cultures, suggesting formulation improvements are needed.
Background/Objectives: An ideal bone scaffold should promote bone cell growth and functional vascularization, hence the importance of imbuing biomaterials with pro-angiogenic cues. In this work, silica-based bioactive glasses, either pristine (SBA3) or doped with copper (SBA3_Cu), were embedded in poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), which was also used as a control. Methods: In vitro co-cultures of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (ASCs) and human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1s) were kept in α-MEM, MCDB131, and EndoGRO media to test the biomaterials. The co-cultures were visualized by immunofluorescence and SEM, while flow cytometry was performed to characterize cellular immunophenotype. The angiogenic potential was evaluated using conditioned media of co-cultures to perform a tubulogenesis assay and VEGF-A quantification. Results: Immunophenotypic analysis showed a significant decrease in the endothelial CD31+ cellular subset, whereas the OB-like cellular subset expressing CD105, CD73, CD90, and ALP increased in all culture media over time. In α-MEM, HMEC-1s were unable to form a capillary network independent of the substrates. A more organized network was visible when co-cultures were plated on PCL, in MCDB131 and EndoGRO, or if they were kept in EndoGRO on PCL/SBA3_Cu. The VEGF-A concentrations were similar in the conditioned media from co-cultures grown on PCL/SBA_Cu, in EndoGRO, and on PCL and PCL/SBA3, in MCDB131. Conclusions: The presence of copper did not promote the angiogenic potential of HMEC-1, likely due to the low concentration of released copper ions and the predominant osteoinductive effect of the other ions released by the bioglass. A re-evaluation of formulation and structure of bioglass scaffold could enhance the angiogenic potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orrico et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: