Evaluates how different stent-graft designs affect blood flow in iliac arteries, suggesting better designs exist.
Background: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, the performance of stent-grafts used during this procedure may be affected by their structural design, particularly in anatomically challenging, tortuous iliac arteries. This study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of different stent-graft limb designs in an in vitro EVAR simulation using compliant three-dimensional (3D)-printed iliac artery models with controlled angulations. Methods: Four commercially available stent-grafts (Anaconda®, Endurant II®, Treo®, Zenith Spiral-Z®) representing different stent-strut configurations (including O-ring, Z-stent, and spiral designs) were deployed in compliant 3D-printed vascular phantoms simulating severe iliac angulations of 75°, 90°, and 105°. The models were incorporated into a pulsatile flow circuit, and pressure and flow velocity were measured proximally and distally to the angulated segment. Results: Across all tested angulations, the O-ring-based design demonstrated the most favorable hemodynamic performance. In particular, the Anaconda stent-graft showed the smallest pressure loss and the lowest increase in distal flow velocity, especially in the 90° and 105° models. These findings suggest that O-ring-supported structures provide greater flexibility and conformability in severely angulated iliac segments. Conclusions: In this controlled in vitro setting, stent-grafts with O-ring strut morphology better preserved flow conditions than other tested configurations in tortuous anatomy. These results suggest that stent-graft structural design may influence device behavior in challenging iliac anatomy under controlled in vitro conditions. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating bench data and do not represent direct evidence for clinical device selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wojtuń et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: