Essay analyzes W.E.B. Du Bois's unpublished novel 'Scorn', revealing its literary failures and philosophical challenges.
This essay considers the theoretical, methodological, and ethical stakes of reading W.E.B. Du Bois’s 1905 unpublished novel “Scorn” as a failure. Between publishing the landmark collection Souls of Black Folk (1903) and his novel The Quest of the Silver Fleece (1911), W.E.B. Du Bois drafted a three-part, genre-defining historical romance set in the years preceding the Civil War. Within the expansive body of research on Du Bois and his fiction, “Scorn” is either overlooked or read as a predecessor to Black Reconstruction (1935). Rather than seeking to recover “Scorn’s” literary and political merits, this essay offers a reading practice that takes seriously “Scorn’s” failings—from its plots to publication plans—without attempting to resolve or redeem them. Approaching failure as a material reality, rather than a political posture, “Scorn” emerges as a text that indexes a particular moment in Du Bois’s early twentieth-century thinking when he was trying, and failing, to reconcile the novel’s formal demands with his burgeoning philosophy of history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Autumn Womack (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: