Key result
Contrast-enhanced CTA calcium scoring correlates highly with unenhanced CT for Agatston and volume metrics.
Why the study?
Aortic arch calcium poses risks during TAVI, but calcium scoring is typically restricted to the valve and no standardized approach exists for regional quantification on contrast-enhanced CTA.
Does calcium scoring using contrast-enhanced CTA correlate with unenhanced CT imaging in patients undergoing aortic evaluation?
Observational (n=55)
Does calcium scoring using contrast-enhanced CTA correlate with unenhanced CT imaging in patients undergoing aortic evaluation?
Effect estimate: Pearson r2 0.87 (Agatston) and 0.89 (volume)
Calcium scoring can be feasibly performed on contrast-enhanced CTA using an image-dependent threshold, showing high correlation with standard unenhanced CT, which may help assess stroke risk prior to TAVI.
May enable calcium scoring on contrast-enhanced CTA; leaves open prospective validation before TAVI adoption.
In clinical practice, calcium scoring is typically measured only in the aortic valve region. However, calcium accumulation in other areas, such as the aortic arch, can pose risks during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Dislodged plaque due to catheter manipulation may lead to cerebrovascular events. Establishing a method to assess calcium distribution in these regions could help to determine when protective measures in the carotid arteries are necessary. This study aims to validate a calcium segmentation technique in contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) and establish a method for regional calcium quantification, as no standardized approach currently exists. Additionally, it assesses the correlation and reproducibility of calcium scores obtained from unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT images using the Agatston method and calcium volume to validate the proposed methodology. A dataset of 55 patients with both contrast-enhanced and unenhanced images was used, where calcium was segmented and scores were calculated for each image type. Notably, the threshold for the segmentation method in contrast-enhanced images was found to be image-dependent. Additionally, contrast-enhanced images were reconstructed to ensure the same spacing between slices as their non-contrast counterparts. The results showed high Pearson r 2 correlation values (0.87 and 0.89) between calcium scores in contrast-enhanced and unenhanced images for the Agatston and volume metrics, respectively, although the Agatston method exhibited greater variability. Additionally, calcium volume in various aortic regions was calculated, with the arch showing the most significant accumulation of calcium. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using calcium scoring in contrast-enhanced imaging with an image-dependent threshold. Furthermore, assessing calcium in other aortic regions is proposed as a risk factor prior to TAVI intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serrano-Antón et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Aortic calcification (n=55). Contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) calcium segmentation vs. Unenhanced CT images was evaluated on Correlation of calcium scores between contrast-enhanced and unenhanced CT images using Agatston and volume metrics (Pearson r2 0.87 (Agatston) and 0.89 (volume)). Calcium scoring using contrast-enhanced CT angiography demonstrated high correlation with unenhanced CT images for both Agatston (r2=0.87) and volume metrics (r2=0.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: