Examines gender bias in teaching evaluations among students, indicating significant disparities in perceptions.
Professor review websites are widely used by students but may transmit biased information. This paper examines who generates gender bias in teaching evaluations. Using scraped instructor data from RateMyProfessor.com, I document descriptive evidence of a gender gap. I then conduct a randomized experiment in which students evaluate identical teaching content delivered with male or female voice-overs. The results show a causal gender penalty of about 0.11 points on a 1–5 scale. This penalty is concentrated among students who actively post online reviews, suggesting that bias is driven by a subset of reviewers rather than the broader student population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephanie El Khoury (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: