Professor review websites are widely used by students but may transmit biased information. This paper examines who generates gender bias in teaching evaluations. Using scraped instructor data from RateMyProfessor.com, I document descriptive evidence of a gender gap. I then conduct a randomized experiment in which students evaluate identical teaching content delivered with male or female voice-overs. The results show a causal gender penalty of about 0.11 points on a 1–5 scale. This penalty is concentrated among students who actively post online reviews, suggesting that bias is driven by a subset of reviewers rather than the broader student population.
Stephanie El Khoury (Fri,) studied this question.