Evaluates cost-effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride application for root caries management, indicating implications for Medicaid beneficiaries.
Background Dental caries are common oral health conditions among Medicaid beneficiaries. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has been applied to manage dental caries. Objectives To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SDF application for managing high-risk root caries within the context of Medicaid, a Markov simulation model was adopted from a healthcare system perspective. Methods A 45-year-old subject with 21 residual teeth was simulated for 19 years. Twice-yearly 38% SDF application on the tooth surface at risk for caries was compared with 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish in terms of effectiveness and cost. Tooth-years free of extraction were set as the effect. Results Compared with 5% NaF varnish, 38% SDF application was cost-effective, with a difference of 6.34 extraction-free tooth-years and an additional cost of $7798 (incremental cost-of-effectiveness ratio, $1229 per extraction-free tooth-year gained; incremental net monetary benefit, $309 355). One-way sensitivity analyses on SDF and NaF costs confirmed cost-effectiveness of SDF application over NaF varnish. Conclusions An integrated orosystemic care model is underscored to disseminate the benefits of SDF application as the Medicaid payment system shifts from fee-for-service to managed care. Semiannual 38% SDF application might reduce and delay tooth extraction due to root caries in statewide dental provider shortage areas, particularly “dental deserts,” where Medicaid-accepting dentists are not available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: