This perspective reports the evolution of urban spatial dynamic modeling towards climate neutrality and resilience, suggesting actionable pathways.
Urban spatial dynamic modeling (SDM) has long been used to anticipate land-use change, urban expansion, and infrastructure demand. Yet, despite increasing methodological sophistication, most applications remain oriented toward reproducing spatial patterns rather than supporting sustainability transitions. This perspective argues that SDM is at a turning point and outlines how it can evolve to address climate neutrality, resilience, and equity in both growing and shrinking cities. Five interlinked development pathways are proposed: (i) hybrid AI–theory models balancing predictive accuracy and interpretability; (ii) human-centric accessibility frameworks grounded in time geography; (iii) network-based resilience approaches drawing on graph theory and space syntax; (iv) semantic place functions enabled by vision–language foundation models; and (v) scalable architectures applicable across diverse data and governance contexts. Together, these pathways reposition SDM from a forecasting tool to a transition-support instrument, aligning it with planning support systems and enabling more sustainable and just urban futures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zipan Cai (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: