Retrospective analysis finds higher rates of psychological and neurodevelopmental disorders in craniosynostosis patients, indicating need for routine monitoring.
Objective Craniosynostosis is associated with psychological and neurodevelopmental disorders (PNDD). Using a multi-center database, PNDD incidence in craniosynostosis was compared to controls and by suture. Design Retrospective analysis of TriNetX database (2015–2025). Participants Patients (<18 years) with craniosynostosis were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision code Q75 without excluding possible syndromes, and unmatched controls were identified without craniofacial diagnoses. Results Patients (N = 12,870) with sagittal (36.4%), coronal (35.5%), metopic (22.5%), lambdoid (2.1%), or multi-suture (3.5%) craniosynostosis were compared to controls (N = 22,401,930). Patients with craniosynostosis were significantly more likely to be younger, male, white, and non-Hispanic. Without controlling for sociodemographics, patients with craniosynostosis had higher rates of most PNDD. Speech disorders (14.5%–27.8% vs 4.9%) and motor disorders (5.6%–11.7% vs 1.2%) were frequent concerns. Except for the lambdoid group, patients with craniosynostosis had significantly higher incidence of intellectual disability (1.4%–7.1% vs 0.3%), autism spectrum disorder (3.4%–6.6% vs 2.1%), and scholastic disorder (1.6%–5.7% vs 1.0%). ADHD was significantly higher in the multi-suture (8.2%), metopic (6.3%), and sagittal (5.0%) craniosynostosis groups than in controls (3.6%), while conduct disorder was higher in the metopic (2.9%) and sagittal (1.7%) groups than in controls (1.1%). Only the multi-suture group (9.0%) had higher anxiety than controls (2.9%). All PNDD were higher in multiple-suture craniosynostosis than in single-suture craniosynostosis, with the metopic group having the highest PNDD (2.8%–21.5%). Conclusions The incidence of PNDD ranged from 1.1% to 27.8% in patients with craniosynostosis and varied by suture, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary care and routine developmental surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harrison et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: