Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective study validates a new scale for assessing respiratory secretions in mechanically ventilated patients, improving clinical assessment.
Background: Respiratory secretions are a common complication in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, yet no validated tool is available to classify secretion type and amount in this setting. Methods: We conducted a prospective study in 2 mixed ICUs in southern Brazil (January 2022–January 2024). Adult patients intubated for >24 h and requiring suctioning were eligible. Secretions were collected during routine suctioning, photographed, and classified using the newly developed Respiratory Secretion Scale (RESES). The scale categorizes secretions into 7 types (mucoid, mucopurulent-1, mucopurulent-2, purulent, bloody-mucoid, bloody, bloody-purulent) and 3 amounts (small, medium, large). Inter-observer reliability was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa. Associations between secretion characteristics and clinical variables were analyzed using chi-square, t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Among 70 subjects included in the validation phase, inter-observer agreement was excellent (kappa type = 0.87; amount = 0.85; combined = 0.82). In 398 subjects analyzed for clinical associations, purulent and bloody-mucoid secretions were more frequent among nonsurvivors, whereas mucoid secretions predominated among survivors (P = .03). Large secretion amounts were associated with respiratory disease, pulmonary infection focus, and longer duration of mechanical ventilation (all P < .05). In the multinomial logistic regression, the diagnosis and the pulmonary infection focus remained significantly associated with both secretion type (Relative Risks [RR] = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05–1.56, P = .02; RR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.12–2.14, P = .008, respectively) and amount (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.08–2.44, P < .02; RR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.09–2.68, P = .02, respectively), although chest imaging with consolidation was associated only with secretion amount (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.09, P < .007). Conclusions: The RESES is a simple, visual tool that standardized secretion assessment in mechanically ventilated subjects, improving clinical communication and providing a foundation for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: