Examines the relationship between entropy and capacity in neural learning systems, suggesting new insights into performance limits.
We study the relationship between Shannon entropy, model capacity, and dataset scale in neural learning systems, asking: why do learning systems abruptly fail on tasks that remain structurally feasible? We propose the Constructibility Framework, in which learning success is governed by an effective capacity constraint L(S) = Cβ · nγ / Hα. Through controlled entropy injection and systematic scaling of transformer architectures (DistilBERT, BERT-base, RoBERTa-large) on two benchmarks (IMDb, SST-2), we observe sharp, reproducible transitions in test accuracy. We resolve a structural gap in prior formulations via Lemma 1 (Risk Bridge Lemma), introduce Theorems 4 and 5, and verify Assumption A3 analytically via Proposition 1. The curve-collapse coefficient λ = γ/α = 0.331 is derived from first principles. An empirical scaling law E(S) ~ H1.42 / (C0.31 · n0.47) is fit with R² = 0.91 across architectures and both benchmarks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karimov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: