Why the study?
Rare variant genetics have been associated with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), but the role of genetics remains unsettled.
Is the genetic risk of DCM in first-degree relatives and the prevalence of rare variants similar between women with peripartum cardiomyopathy and those with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Is the genetic risk of DCM in first-degree relatives and the prevalence of rare variants similar between women with peripartum cardiomyopathy and those with dilated cardiomyopathy?
PPCM and DCM share a similar genetic basis and risk of transmission to first-degree relatives, underscoring the need for genetic evaluation in all patients with PPCM.
Background: Rare variant genetics have been associated with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) but the role of genetics remains unsettled. Objective: The study sought to compare dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) genetic risk in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of female patients with DCM or PPCM (probands), and to assess DCM-relevant rare variant prevalence in DCM/PPCM probands and population controls. Methods: Clinical and genetic data were analyzed from the DCM Precision Medicine Study. Risk of DCM or partial DCM, where pDCM was defined as left ventricular (LV) enlargement or a LV ejection fraction of <50%, was estimated in 665 FDRs from 452 female probands, all of whom had been pregnant, of which 67 had PPCM and 385 had DCM; prevalence of pathogenic, likely pathogenic or uncertain significance variants (P/LP/VUS) was estimated among probands. Results: The risk of DCM/pDCM for FDRs of PPCM probands was similar to that for FDRs of DCM probands (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.47 - 1.28). Estimated DCM prevalence among the lowest-risk FDRs of non-Hispanic EA probands with PPCM (7.0% [95% CI, 0%-14.1%] females, 9.0% [95% CI, 1.6%-16.3%] males) exceeded population estimates from a UK Biobank study (0.30% females, 0.63% males). Estimated prevalences of a P/LP/VUS among AA and EA probands with PPCM were 55.4% (95% CI, 33.1%-77.7%) and 66.0% (95% CI, 38.6%-93.3%), respectively. The estimated prevalence of P/LP variants among EA PPCM probands (26.6%; 95% CI, 12.6%-40.6%) exceeded a population estimate from a UK Biobank study (0.6%). Conclusion: The risk of DCM/pDCM among FDRs was similar regardless of whether their probands had PPCM or DCM. Also, DCM-relevant rare variant findings for females with PPCM or DCM were similar and greater than in population controls suggesting a shared genetic basis for PPCM and DCM. These findings underscore the need for genetic evaluations in all PPCM patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kransdorf et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: