PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2007Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology28 citations

Quantitative Assessment of Angiographic Right Ventricular Wall Motion in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C)

View Full Paper
JIJulia H. IndikElectrophysiologyTWThomas WichterElectrophysiologyKGKathleen GearUniversity of Arizona

Key Result

Quantitative assessment of contrast ventriculography revealed that right ventricular ejection fraction was significantly depressed in ARVD/C patients (41%) compared to normal subjects (60%) (P<0.001).

Key Points

  • To quantify right ventricular wall motion in patients with ARVD/C and compare it to normal subjects.
  • Analysed RV angiographic contours from 19 normal subjects and 23 ARVD/C subjects.
  • Calculated circumferential contour area movement and RV ejection fraction.
  • Assessed wall motion abnormalities in three views and nine zones.
  • Wall motion was reduced by over 30% at tricuspid valve and inferior wall regions (P < 0.001).
  • RV ejection fraction decreased from 60 +/- 11% in normal subjects to 41 +/- 12% in ARVD/C patients (P < 0.001).
  • Wall motion at RVOT and anterior wall was not significantly reduced.

Study Design

Type

Case-Control (n=42)

Structured PICO

Does quantitative assessment of angiographic right ventricular wall motion identify specific regional abnormalities in patients with ARVD/C compared to normal subjects?

P
Population
23 subjects with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) and 19 normal subjects (total n=42)
I
Intervention
Quantitative assessment of right ventricular wall motion based on contrast ventriculography
C
Comparator
Normal subjects
O
Outcome
Contour area movement during contraction (circumferentially and in nine zones) and right ventricular ejection fractionsurrogate

Quantitative angiographic assessment of right ventricular wall motion identifies specific regional abnormalities in ARVD/C, primarily in the tricuspid and inferior wall regions, which may aid in objective diagnosis.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 41% vs 60%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Angiography of the right ventricle (RV) is a standard, reference technique to diagnose wall motion abnormalities in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C). RV wall motion is usually assessed by qualitative, visual impression, and has lacked a quantitative basis for defining abnormalities. Since the normal RV has a markedly asymmetric movement, angiographic interpretation can differ, even among experienced clinicians. The purpose of this study was to quantify RV wall motion based on contrast ventriculography in patients with ARVD/C and to specify the severity and location of wall motion abnormalities, as compared with normal subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the angiographic contours of the RV in three views from 19 normal subjects and 23 subjects with ARVD/C. Contour area movement during contraction was calculated circumferentially and further analyzed in nine zones. RV ejection fraction was also computed. Wall motion in ARVD/C was depressed by more than 30% at the tricuspid valve and inferior wall regions (P < 0.001) and significantly reduced at the apex (P = 0.003). However, the RVOT and anterior wall motion were not significantly reduced. RV ejection fraction was depressed from 60 +/- 11% in normal subjects to 41 +/- 12% in ARVD/C patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Wall motion abnormalities in ARVD/C can be quantified and compared with normal controls, showing primarily reduced movement in the tricuspid and inferior wall regions. This study delineates objective measurements that can be used to aid in the diagnosis of ARVD/C. In addition, they may be incorporated in future refinements of criteria to diagnose ARVD/C.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Indik et al. (2007) conducted a case-control in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) (n=42). Quantitative assessment of contrast ventriculography vs. Normal subjects was evaluated on Right ventricular ejection fraction (p=<0.001). Quantitative assessment of contrast ventriculography revealed that right ventricular ejection fraction was significantly depressed in ARVD/C patients (41%) compared to normal subjects (60%) (P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a081bc31e0fcf4a43e8a7ddhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00974.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ventricular dimensions and wall motion assesed by echocardiography in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia1988 · 71 citations
  2. 2Do Patients with Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Ventricular Arrhythmias Have a Normal Right Ventricular Wall Motion?2005 · 27 citations
  3. 3Evaluation and classification of right ventricular wall motion abnormalities in healthy subjects by 3-tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging2014 · 24 citations
  4. 4The right ventricle: always normal in normal subjects?2014 · 2 citations
  5. 5Echocardiographic assessment of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy2001 · 9 citations