Key result
Boxer dogs show an ~18% longer Tpeak-Tend interval on lead rV2 versus other breeds.
Why the study?
Electrocardiographic markers are used to classify arrhythmogenic risk in humans, but their characteristics and differences between Boxer dogs and non-Boxer dogs needed investigation.
Do Boxer dogs exhibit different electrocardiographic markers of myocardial conduction and repolarization compared to non-Boxer dogs?
Observational (n=200)
Do Boxer dogs exhibit different electrocardiographic markers of myocardial conduction and repolarization compared to non-Boxer dogs?
Absolute Event Rate: 45% vs 38%
p-value: p=0.01
Boxer dogs exhibit slower dispersion of myocardial late repolarization in lead rV2 compared to other breeds, which may be relevant to their specific arrhythmogenic risk profile.
May signal breed-specific repolarization differences relevant to Boxer arrhythmogenic risk; leaves open prognostic value pending prospective validation.
Electrocardiographic markers have been used in people to classify arrhythmogenic risk. The aims of this study were to investigate electrocardiographic markers of conduction and repolarization in Boxers and non-Boxer dogs, and compare such findings between groups. Ten-lead standard electrocardiograms of Boxer dogs and non-Boxers recorded from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Dogs ≥4 years of age and weighing >20kg were included. Animals with valvular insufficiencies, congenital cardiopathies, cardiac dilation, suspected systolic dysfunction, biphasic T-wave, bundle branch blocks, and those receiving antiarrhythmics were excluded. Electrocardiographic markers of conduction, QRS duration (QRSd) and dispersion (QRSD), and repolarization (corrected QT interval, Tpeak-Tend, JT and JTpeak), as well as derived indices, were measured. Two hundred dogs met the inclusion/exclusion requirements, including 97 Boxers (8.1±2.5 years old; 30±7kg) and 103 non-Boxer (8.8±2.5 years old, 30±8kg). QRSd and QRSD, and repolarization markers in lead II and left precordial lead V4 were considered similar between groups. Dispersion of late repolarization on lead rV2, Tpeak-Tend interval, was considered longer in Boxers (45±8ms vs 38±10ms, P=0.01). The Tpeak-Tend/JTpeak and the JTpeak/JT also differed between groups. Our results indicate that the dispersion of myocardial late repolarization in lead rV2 is slower in Boxers than other dog breeds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Electrocardiographic markers of arrhythmogenic risk (n=200). Boxer breed vs. Non-Boxer dogs was evaluated on Dispersion of late repolarization (Tpeak-Tend interval) on lead rV2 (p=0.01). Boxer dogs exhibited a longer dispersion of late repolarization (Tpeak-Tend interval) on lead rV2 compared to non-Boxer dogs (45 vs 38 ms, P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: