Key result
Prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval in lead V1 distinguishes ARVC from idiopathic RVOT-VT with ~84% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Does the Tpeak-Tend interval on sinus rhythm ECG distinguish arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy from idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia in patients with right ventricular tachycardia?
Observational (n=38)
Does the Tpeak-Tend interval on sinus rhythm ECG distinguish arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy from idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia in patients with right ventricular tachycardia?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.880
Absolute Event Rate: 137.1% vs 93.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
A prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval on sinus rhythm ECG, particularly >97 ms in lead V1, can help distinguish arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy from idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia.
May support ECG differentiation of ARVC from RVOT-VT; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The two predominant etiologies of right ventricular tachycardia (VT) are arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and idiopathic VT arising from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). Discrimination between these two entities is critical, as their prognoses and therapeutic options differ. The Tpeak -Tend (Tpe) interval reflects the transmural repolarization dispersion and its prolongation is associated with high mortality. METHODS: We compared the sinus rhythm electrocardiogram (ECG) of 43 patients (24 male, 43 ± 16 years) with VT originating from right ventricle. Five patients under antiarrhythmic drug therapy were excluded. Tpe interval was measured in each precordial leads and compared among patients with ARVC and RVOT-VT. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (16 male, 42 ± 16 years) met the Task Force criteria for the diagnosis of ARVC, and 13 patients (seven male, 45 ± 14 years) had idiopathic RVOT tachycardia. Patients with ARVC had significantly prolonged Tpe intervals in all precordial leads compared to patients with idiopathic RVOT VT (137.1 ± 32.6 ms vs 93.8 ± 16.9 ms; P < 0.001 in V1, 133.2 ± 35.5 ms vs 104.7 ± 16.9 ms; P = 0.01 in V2, 125.7 ± 31.5 ms vs 99.1 ± 19.6 ms; P = 0.09 in V3, 121.9 ± 26.5 ms vs 92.3 ± 19.7 ms; P = 0.001 in V4, 123.1 ± 26.5 ms vs 99.5 ± 20:1 ms; P = 0.04 in V5 and 126.9 ± 32.2 ms vs 89 ± 11.3 ms; P < 0.001 in V6, respectively). For the diagnosis of ARVC, Tpe cut-off value of 97 ms in V1 had 84% sensitivity and 62% specificity (area under curve = 0.880). CONCLUSION: In patients with VT of RV origin, the prolonged Tpe interval in sinus rhythm electrocardiogram supports the diagnosis of ARVC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gölcük et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Right ventricular tachycardia (n=38). Tpeak-Tend (Tpe) interval measurement vs. Idiopathic RVOT-VT was evaluated on Tpe interval in lead V1 (AUC 0.880, p=<0.001). The Tpeak-Tend interval in lead V1 was significantly prolonged in ARVC compared to idiopathic RVOT-VT (137.1 vs 93.8 ms; P<0.001), with a 97 ms cut-off yielding 84% sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: