Key result
SAPIEN 3 commissural misalignment is not linked to increased gradients or 5-year mortality.
Why the study?
Commissural misalignment impairs coronary access in self-expandable prostheses and may increase valve gradients and aortic regurgitation, prompting assessment of alignment in balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 valves and its long-term clinical impact.
Does commissural misalignment increase transvalvular gradient or mortality in patients treated with SAPIEN 3 valves?
Cohort (n=105)
Does commissural misalignment increase transvalvular gradient or mortality in patients treated with SAPIEN 3 valves?
Commissural misalignment in SAPIEN 3 valves does not appear to significantly impact transvalvular gradients or mortality at 5 years.
No association seen with misalignment and SAPIEN 3 outcomes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Commissural misalignment (CMA) has demonstrated to difficult future coronary access in self-expandable prosthesis and has been related with subclinical leaflet thrombosis and a potential increase in valve gradients and aortic regurgitation at follow-up. AIMS: The aim of our study was to assess the commissural alignment of the balloon expandable SAPIEN 3 valve (Edwards Lifesciences) and to evaluate its impact on transvalvular gradient and mortality at 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated with SAPIEN 3 prosthesis guided with intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) with a minimal follow-up of 5 years were included. Commissural alignment between the prosthesis and the native valve was measured by TEE by two independent cardiologists using a standardized 3-cusp view pre and post-valve deployment. CMA was defined as a neocommissure deviation > 30° compared with native commissures. Echocardiographic gradients and clinical events were recorded during follow-up and compared between groups. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients (54% male, mean age 80.4 years) were included; 63 (40%) were classified as "aligned" (CMA < 30°) and 42 (60%) as "misaligned" (CMA > 30°). Patients with CMA > 30° presented smaller aortic annulus (23.8 vs. 20.7, p < 0.01) and received smaller valves. There was a slight increase of mean transvalvular gradient during follow-up (9.2-10.3 mmHg, p < 0.05), without significant differences between groups. Mortality rate was 16.2% at 1 year and 49.5% at 5 years; and not related to commissural alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Significant CMA is present in 40% of patients treated with SAPIEN 3 valves, however, we didn't find a significant association between CMA and gradient increase or mortality during long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unzué et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis treated with SAPIEN 3 prosthesis (n=105). Commissural misalignment (CMA > 30°) vs. Commissural alignment (CMA < 30°) was evaluated on Transvalvular gradient and mortality at 5 years of follow-up. Commissural misalignment (>30°) was present in 40% of patients treated with SAPIEN 3 valves but was not significantly associated with gradient increase or mortality at 5 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: