Key result
Sutureless AVR for severe AS yields ~83% one-year survival but carries permanent pacemaker risks.
Observational (n=12)
Initial experience with sutureless aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis demonstrated good early hemodynamic results and survival, but was associated with an 8.3% rate of permanent pacemaker implantation.
May guide cautious early use in high-risk aortic stenosis; leaves open pacemaker risk assessment in larger trials.
BACKGROUND: Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) has been developed as an alternative surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SU-AVR through an assessment of hemodynamic performance and safety. METHODS: From December 2014 to June 2016, a total of 12 consecutive patients with severe AS underwent SU-AVR. The endpoints were overall survival and valve-related complications (paravalvular leakage, valve thrombosis, migration, endocarditis, and permanent pacemaker implantation). The mean follow-up duration was 18.1±8.6 months. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 77.1±5.8 years and their mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 9.2±17.7. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 94.5±37.3 minutes and 54.9±12.5 minutes, respectively. Follow-up echocardiography showed good prosthesis function with low transvalvular pressure gradients (mean, 13.9±8.6 mm Hg and peak, 27.2±15.0 mm Hg) at a mean of 9.9±4.2 months. No cases of primary paravalvular leakage, valve thrombosis, migration, or endocarditis were reported. A new permanent pacemaker was implanted in 1 patient (8.3%). The 1-year overall survival rate was 83.3%±10.8%. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience with SU-AVR demonstrated excellent early clinical outcomes with good hemodynamic results. However, there was a high incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation compared to the rate for conventional AVR, which is a problem that should be solved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=12). Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) was evaluated on Overall survival and valve-related complications. Sutureless aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis yielded an 83.3% 1-year overall survival rate, but was associated with an 8.3% rate of permanent pacemaker implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: